HomePhotography IndexPage 1Page 2Page 3Page 4Page 5Page 6

.

.

Canon EOS 5D Review • Metering

Peter Kun Frary

 

Exposure Controls

Gone are the Basic Zone and Creative Zone designations of the EOS 10D, 20D and Elan series. Instead the 5D merely has a single "basic" mode, Full Auto, and the usual semi-automatic and manual modes. As its name implies, Full Auto does everything for you except aim and press the button. The semiautomatic and manual modes make up the bulk of exposure modes: Program AE, Aperture Priority, Shutter Priority and Manual. The glaring omission is Depth of Field mode (DEP). Save Full Auto and DEP mode, these are the same modes found in most 1 series cameras.

MGM Grand, Las Vegas • EOS 5D, EF 24-105 4L IS USM • 1/13 sec, F4, ISO 800, -1 EC, IS engaged

The modes are clearly labeled and available at the twist of the Mode Dial (Command Dial in vintage EOS jargon), a big knob on the top left of the camera. The Mode Dial feels solid but is easier to turn than the dial used on the Elan 7NE. Surprisingly there is no lock button, so some may wander from mode to mode unintentionally. The $350 Elan 7NE sports a lock button on the Mode Dial.

Any of the semiautomatic and manual modes may be customized with special drive, AF and flash settings; custom functions; -2 to +2 of exposure compensation; various file formats, pictures styles and auto bracketing. You may save your favorite combination of exposure mode, metering pattern, drive, AF, etc., as a Camera User Setting (C), ready to dial-in at a single stroke.

Full Auto and Program AE (P) follow similar exposure algorithms. However, Program AE allows user customization and manual overrides. Full Auto is merely a crippled Program AE mode and is therefore redundant and unnecessary. The only possible use for Full Auto is protecting your camera from tyros pressing a wrong button when they borrow your camera. Most buttons and user settings are are disabled in Full Auto.

Top Deck View • 5D top is simple & uncluttered • EOS 50D, EF-s 17-55 2.8 IS USM, ST-E2, 430EX

Unfortunately, often Full Auto chooses silly aperture/shutter combinations. For example, with an EF 50 1.4 USM mounted and camera pointed out the window, both Full Auto and Program AE indicate F3.5 at 1/500 sec. This is a sensible exposure with an EF 300 2.8L USM. However, F4.5 at 1/250 or F6.7 at 1/25 are better choices with a 50 mm lens. Although you may shift the program in Program AE, you're stuck with it in Full Auto. Full Auto is completely out of place on this camera.

Where is DEP Mode?

Curiously, the EOS 5D lacks DEP mode. Heck it even lacks the crippled A-DEP mode found on the Rebels and the 10D/20D/30D. Although it ain't a deal killer, I miss DEP mode.

DEP has been one of my favorite modes since I bought an EOS 10S in 1990. Every EOS camera since the early 90s has some form of DEP mode, so this is odd indeed. DEP mode automatically sets optimal F-stop and hyperfocal settings for maximum depth of field. Back in the day, we stopped down and used the depth of field (DOF) scale to manually set hyperfocal distance. Of course, back in the day most lenses were primes and had distance and DOF scales. Today, many zooms lack both distance and DOF scales and, subsequently, there isn't a practical way to maximize DOF. That is, until Canon invented DEP mode then tossed it aside.

Meter Patterns & Metering

Like the 1 series, the EOS 5D has four metering patterns: evaluative, center-weighted, 8% partial and 3.5% spot. Like the Elan 7NE, Rebel XT and 20D, the 5D uses a 35-zone silicon photocell (SPC) for metering. These zones are evaluated by the camera's CPU render better exposures biased to the active AF point.

Unlike earlier cameras like the EOS 5 and Elan 7, partial or spot metering can't be linked to the active AF point.

Urban Palm • EOS 5D & EF 70-200 4L USM

Exposure Accuracy

I mainly shot chromes with EOS film cameras and was accustomed to exacting exposure requirements and narrow latitude. The EOS 3 and Elan 7NE nail exposure about 90% of the time in Evaluative metering mode. The remainder of the time I used spot metering, exposure compensation or substitute metering techniques to arrive at a desired exposure. I found 5D metering to be accurate and consistent most of the time. However sunny day landscapes in Hawai need -1/3 to -1/2 exposure compensation to keep highlights from blowing out! What's the deal here?

My EOS 5D's meter is perfect according to the "sunny F16 rule." That is, with ISO 100, a meter reading off a Kodak gray card or a clear blue northern sky indicates 1/100 at F16 in the midday Hawaiian sun. This is a good test for any meter and affords a standard of comparison between different bodies.

Why is exposure compensation needed if the meter is dead on? Digital sensors have narrow exposure latitude and, thus, can't record the extremes of shadows and highlights present on a sunny day. Unfortunately, the CMOS sensor is less tolerant of overexposure than slide film. Thus, highlights blow out or clip with slight overexposure. Thus, you'll need to place important highlights at one extreme of the photographic range (far right of histogram) and let the mids and shadows fall where they may.

The 5D's CMOS sensor has a recording range of 5-6 stops in JPEG mode, similar to slide film and half that of print film. If you do a little fancy dancing during RAW conversion, you can dig out a couple more stops of shadow detail. However a clipped highlight is gone forever, hence the -1/3 EC on sunny days. In dimmer light--overcast landscapes--exposure is usually dead on and exposure compensation isn't needed.

All meters can be fooled and you must learn when to override them (e.g., bright sunsets, strong backlight, predominantly light or dark scenes). The key is to meter for important highlights--i.e., place them on the extreme right of the histogram--and let the shadows go black.

Meter Range

The EOS 5D has meter range of EV 1-20, same as the Elan 7 and 10D. I find this curious as the AF range is mismatched at EV -.5 to 18. Of course in practice it's better to have more AF sensitivity rather than less. However, the 1991 Elan had a metering range of EV -1 to 20. I want the 2 extra stops of meter sensitivity back!

Picture Styles

Although the names of individual Picture Styles may lead some to believe this a replacement for the "Basic Zone" modes, this is totally different. Instead of programmed camera setting, e.g., AI Servo with large aperture, these are formulas for image color and contrast processing. I think of them as different types of film. None of them correspond to a specific type of film. Sorry Velvia and Portra fans. However, there are 6 preset looks or styles available visa the LCD menu: Standard, Portrait, Landscape, Neutral, Faithful and Monochrome, plus 3 User Defined settings.

Any of the styles may be tweaked with your own color and contrast preferences. For faster access, you can assign your favorite setting to the "C" position on the Mode Dial.

If you shoot RAW, change styles during conversion in Digital Photo Professional (DPP). If RAW files are processed in DPP, this feature also works on files from earlier cameras such as the EOS 10D and D30. Additional styles may be downloaded from Canon but are useable only in DPP (you can't use them in Photoshop for example).

I don't find Picture Styles to be an earth shattering feature but often find one or more of the styles pleasing. If you find one you like, you'll save a little time post-processing in Photoshop.

Kamehameha I • Honolulu • EOS 5D, EF 24-105 4LIS USM

Image Quality

One of the main differences between DSLR and point 'n shoot digicams is digicam images are highly processed in-camera. That is, they have large amounts of sharpening, saturation and contrast automatically added to the image upon capture.Thus, digicam images are optimized from the getgo to look good on computer monitors. DSLRs have little or no processing added to the image. Even if you adjust parameters to maximum settings, you still can't duplicate the heavily processed look of digicams. Why are DSLRs designed this way? To simulate the photographic look of film--rather than a processed digital look--and allow the user to apply creative options according to taste and need.

With that said, 5D image quality is nothing short of breathtaking, and may be enlarged to poster sized prints without misgivings or apologies. Noise performance at high ISO is the best I have seen. EOS 5D images shot at ISO 1600 are as clean as 10D images at ISO 400. Of course the sheer size of 5D images enhance the noiseless impression: full frame images require less enlargement than 1.6x crop bodies, making noise even less apparent than their smaller siblings. Using an Apple Cinema display, I can see noise in 10D and 20D images at "fit to screen" sizes. EOS 5D files require several more levels of zoom to get to that point!

I was still seeing plenty of detail in 4000dpi film scans that were unresolved in 10D images. Sure the 10D files were grainless and smoother than film scans, but scans of Portra 160 landscapes resolved every blade of grass, whereas the 10D revealed only a pretty green blur. The 5D has finally put my Portra 160 and Provia 100 to rest. May they rest in peace.

Digital Work Flow

DSLR images are designed primarily for printing and that's where they really show their stuff. Think of EOS 5D files as digital negatives. Negatives need interpretation--adjustment--to look their best. Here's my basic workflow:

1. I upload RAW images to computer via card reader and open thumbnails in Digital Photo Professional (DPP).

2. If needed, I adjust parameters (WB, exposure compensation, etc.) or Picture Styles in DPP to taste.

3. After parameter adjustments, I convert to a lossless format such as 16-bit TIFF. This file will serve as my master work file.

4. Photoshop adjustments--levels, saturation and contrast control--are performed if needed and saved.

4. Finally, I resize and sharpen multiple versions for specific print sizes or web display (I use "Save As" for optimized JPEG versions).

Never save a master work file as a JPEG. Always use TIFF or native Photoshop image format. If adjustments are needed in the future, you can tweak the master work file in without loss of image quality. If you screw up the work master, you can convert the RAW file again to 16-bit TIFF and start over (hopefully you stored it in a safe place!). Unfortunately, uploading, browsing and converting is time consuming, more so than using a light table. With digital you do all the lab work! With film you pay the lab to do it.

EOS 5D files need much fewer adjustments than film scans. They also need fewer adjustments than 10D files. My initial reaction to the vivid detail, color and sharpness in 5D files was utter astonishment. Man this is a great camera. Unfortunately I quickly discovered which of my lenses weren't so great, especially around the edges. So expect hidden expenses as lens upgrades will be eminent upon purchase of a 5D!

Why Raw Files?

Why do I shoot RAW instead of JPEG? It yields ultimate quality images with maximum control and creative options. Raw image characteristics may be altered in Digital Photo Professional (DPP) without degrading data. Plus, most of the parameters in DPP are the same parameters available in camera: exposure compensation, white balance, sharpness, contrast, color tone, saturation, color space and display size. DPP allows you to apply parameter changes as if set when the picture was taken.

Canon's conversion applications get the job done extremely well. The resulting TIFF file requires fewer post-conversion tweaks than Photoshop CS or Phase One Capture One DSLR. If you work with RAW files regularly, you'll crave a fast computer. EOS 5D files are large and take a lot longer to process than the small 10D files I was used to.

There are other RAW converters available if you're willing to pay. Of course, Photoshop CS3, CS4 and CS5 ship with an excellent RAW conversion plug-in and is a must-have for 5D owners. Apple Aperture is wonderful and my app of choice. Of course, Adobe's Lightroom is also promising. Phase One Capture One DSLR is reputed to be the best RAW converter but, at $500, it better be.

©Copyright 2006-2011 by Peter Kun Frary • All Rights Reserved

.

HomePhotography IndexPage 1Page 2Page 3Page 4Page 5Page 6